Introduction
The full retrospect of the organizational evolution, thus far, posited in the plethora of literature as multiple relatively theoretical contentions and growing consensuses, further illustrated by empirical contemporary research, well surmounts the coherent need and influence of employee motivation across any organization to achieve success (Ovidiu-Iliuta, 2013). In this highly competitive current environment, organizations should build up a positive robust relationship with its employees, acknowledging the importance of their job levels, roles and job occupancy buttressed by the motivational process in its most holistic form, to organizational effectiveness (Lee and Raschke, 2016).
However, the motivators driving an employee to efficacy varies from individual to individual, significantly depending on causal factors associated with organizational environments, culture, human resource management, leadership methods, job design, reward schemes, incentives, security and a flurry of many other factors both distal and proximal (Ovidiu-Iliuta, 2013). Therefore, it is imperative that an organization and its management identify what motivates its employees to the hilt, thus avoid such factors impinge on organizational performance and be the death knell of it in this exponentially competing environment (Kossivi, Xu and Kalgora, 2016).
The more trans-disciplinary contemporary research has predisposed a current thinking on motivation, leading to previously untouched perspectives which claims to be another platform to review the matter (Lee and Raschke, 2016). It adjoins the conventional theories to recast a much extensive theme with aspects like neuroscience, biology and psychology as measurements in play and in bargain (Clark and Dumas, 2016). Studies of this theory, as per Lee and Raschke (2016), based on the templates and blended with conventional theories manifests the existence of four drives (drive to acquire, bond, comprehend and defend), innate in human nature which are recognized to be the foundation of employee motivation. Research further reveals the tools organizations deploy to satisfy the latter in order to achieve efficacy (Doyle, 2002).
According to the initial studies by Lawrence & Nohria(2002), Nohria, Groysberg, & Lee(2008), below table 01 illustrates the key drives, tools practiced and the action plan implemented to achieve fulfilment of the fundamental needs (Lee and Raschke, 2016).
Introduction
The full retrospect of the organizational evolution, thus far, posited in the plethora of literature as multiple relatively theoretical contentions and growing consensuses, further illustrated by empirical contemporary research, well surmounts the coherent need and influence of employee motivation across any organization to achieve success (Ovidiu-Iliuta, 2013). In this highly competitive current environment, organizations should build up a positive robust relationship with its employees, acknowledging the importance of their job levels, roles and job occupancy buttressed by the motivational process in its most holistic form, to organizational effectiveness (Lee and Raschke, 2016).
However, the motivators driving an employee to efficacy varies from individual to individual, significantly depending on causal factors associated with organizational environments, culture, human resource management, leadership methods, job design, reward schemes, incentives, security and a flurry of many other factors both distal and proximal (Ovidiu-Iliuta, 2013). Therefore, it is imperative that an organization and its management identify what motivates its employees to the hilt, thus avoid such factors impinge on organizational performance and be the death knell of it in this exponentially competing environment (Kossivi, Xu and Kalgora, 2016).
The more trans-disciplinary contemporary research has predisposed a current thinking on motivation, leading to previously untouched perspectives which claims to be another platform to review the matter (Lee and Raschke, 2016). It adjoins the conventional theories to recast a much extensive theme with aspects like neuroscience, biology and psychology as measurements in play and in bargain (Clark and Dumas, 2016). Studies of this theory, as per Lee and Raschke (2016), based on the templates and blended with conventional theories manifests the existence of four drives (drive to acquire, bond, comprehend and defend), innate in human nature which are recognized to be the foundation of employee motivation. Research further reveals the tools organizations deploy to satisfy the latter in order to achieve efficacy (Doyle, 2002).
According to the initial studies by Lawrence & Nohria(2002), Nohria, Groysberg, & Lee(2008), below table 01 illustrates the key drives, tools practiced and the action plan implemented to achieve fulfilment of the fundamental needs (Lee and Raschke, 2016).
Figure 1: Table of summary on drives and correlating tools.
Source: (Groysberg and Abrahams, 2020)
Uptake of employee motivation by Aviation industry
In line with current extremely competitive business atmosphere for all organizations mainly due globalization, Airlines worldwide are exemplified as the most subtle towards the unremitting challenging volatile changes around, just as much as it stands to be the most leading factor supporting globalization (Shahzad N, 2018). In this global competition, process of digitalizing to suit the evolving demands of customers, rise of fuel prices, implementation of policies and procedures, highly competitive ticket fare schemes amongst current and emerging companies, safety and security concerns and further more variables, do thus raise airline costs to sky (Shahzad N, 2018). Accordingly, to sustain the survival under these situations, airlines scrutinize on the strategy of winning passengers by winning employees to generate revenue.
The objective of this blog document is to analyze the inextricable nexus between the aviator's employee motivation strategies and customer centricity, in congruence to the aforementioned blend of both conventional and contemporary drives-based theories.
Uptake of employee motivation by Aviation industry
In line with current extremely competitive business atmosphere for all organizations mainly due globalization, Airlines worldwide are exemplified as the most subtle towards the unremitting challenging volatile changes around, just as much as it stands to be the most leading factor supporting globalization (Shahzad N, 2018). In this global competition, process of digitalizing to suit the evolving demands of customers, rise of fuel prices, implementation of policies and procedures, highly competitive ticket fare schemes amongst current and emerging companies, safety and security concerns and further more variables, do thus raise airline costs to sky (Shahzad N, 2018). Accordingly, to sustain the survival under these situations, airlines scrutinize on the strategy of winning passengers by winning employees to generate revenue.
The objective of this blog document is to analyze the inextricable nexus between the aviator's employee motivation strategies and customer centricity, in congruence to the aforementioned blend of both conventional and contemporary drives-based theories.
References
Clark, I. and Dumas, G., 2016. The Regulation of Task Performance: A Trans-Disciplinary Review. Frontiers in Psychology, pp.1-2.
<https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01862> [Accessed 22 October 2020].
Doyle, J., 2002. Driven: How Human Nature Shapes Our Choices20021Paul R.S. Lawrence and Nitin Nohria. Driven: How Human Nature Shapes Our Choices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass, ISBN: ISBN: 0‐7879‐5785‐2 US $28.00 UK £20.95. International Journal of Educational Management, pp.144-144.
Groysberg, B. and Abrahams, R., 2020. Keep Your Weary Workers Engaged And Motivated. HBS Working Knowledge.
<https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/keep-covid-weary-employees-engaged-and-motivated>[Accessed 22 October 2020].
Kossivi, B., Xu, M. and Kalgora, B., 2016. Study On Determining Factors Of Employee Retention
<http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.45029> [Accessed 22 October 2020].
Lee, M. and Raschke, R., 2016. Understanding Employee Motivation And Organizational Performance: Arguments For A Set-Theoretic Approach.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.004> [Accessed 22 October 2020].
N, Shahzad., 2018. Impact of Employee Motivation on Customer Satisfaction: Study of Airline Industry in Pakistan. Journal of Forensic Psychology, p.1.
<https://www.longdom.org/open-access/impact-of-employee-motivation-on-customer-satisfaction-study-of-airlineindustry-in-pakistan-2475-319X-1000138.pdf> [Accessed 22 October 2020].
Ovidiu-Iliuta, D., 2013. REASER ISSN:2247-6172 Review Info.Reaser.eu.
<http://www.reaser.eu/> [Accessed 22 October 2020].
